There are very few changes between the original Letters Patent of incorporation of the OSPCA from 1913 in comparison to today’s act. With those changes the OSPCA Act is unconstitutional because no one knows if they are or are not breaking the law and there is no definition of “distress”. A law that no one can understand is no law at all.
The OSPCA Act: Hidden Denied Oversight
There are very few changes between the original Letters Patent of incorporation of the OSPCA from 1913 in comparison to today’s act.
(Downloads - 21)
Related products
-
Conservation Authorities Conservation Ontario: Redundant & Grasping for Power
When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion.
(Downloads - 167)
Quick View -
Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 The Good, the Bad and the Ambiguous: Conservation Authorities
We, the members of the Ontario Landowners Association, would like to salute the
provincial government on the action they are taking to rein in the Conservation
Authorities (C.A.s).(Downloads - 57)
Quick View -
Back Off Government: What Municipal Lawyers Need to Know about Crown Patents
This is response to the Ontario Bar Association’s paper as it wasn’t detailed enough to fully explain the Letters Patent/Crown Grants.
(Downloads - 188)
Quick View -
The Municipal Councillor’s Guide: Making Ontario a Better Place to Grow
This document explains how no one is reading the legislation, in its entirety, to know the intent of the legislation.
(Downloads - 57)
Quick View