When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion. As with a number of different agencies, such as Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) inspectors, Ministry of the Environment (MOE) inspectors, By-Law Inspectors, to name a few, the Conservation Authorities are not, lawfully, to expand beyond their legislative authority, and yet they frequently do.
Conservation Authorities Conservation Ontario: Redundant & Grasping for Power
When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion.
(Downloads - 198)
Related products
-
The OSPCA Act: Hidden Denied Oversight
A review of the OSPCA which questions whether such an organization is needed for investigation and inspection.
(Downloads - 24)
Quick View -
Official Plans: What Municipal Councils Need to Know
The government on all levels does not have the authority, under the Planning act to plan for private property.
(Downloads - 181)
Quick View -
NEC and NEPDA: History and Intent
A discussion of the history and original intent of the Niagara Escarpment Commission (NEC) and the Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act (NEPDA).
(Downloads - 68)
Quick View -
Back Off Government: What Municipal Lawyers Need to Know about Crown Patents
This is response to the Ontario Bar Association’s paper as it wasn’t detailed enough to fully explain the Letters Patent/Crown Grants.
(Downloads - 254)
Quick View