When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion. As with a number of different agencies, such as Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) inspectors, Ministry of the Environment (MOE) inspectors, By-Law Inspectors, to name a few, the Conservation Authorities are not, lawfully, to expand beyond their legislative authority, and yet they frequently do.
Conservation Authorities Conservation Ontario: Redundant & Grasping for Power
When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion.
(Downloads - 197)
Related products
-
The OSPCA Act: Hidden Denied Oversight
There are very few changes between the original Letters Patent of incorporation of the OSPCA from 1913 in comparison to today’s act.
(Downloads - 23)
Quick View -
The Municipal Councillor’s Guide: Making Ontario a Better Place to Grow
This document explains how no one is reading the legislation, in its entirety, to know the intent of the legislation.
(Downloads - 75)
Quick View -
The Municipal Councillor’s Guide: making Ontario a Better Place to Grow
A discussion of the roles and responsibilities of Municipal Councils under the Municipal Act.
(Downloads - 45)
Quick View -
Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 The Good, the Bad and the Ambiguous: Conservation Authorities
We, the members of the Ontario Landowners Association, would like to salute the
provincial government on the action they are taking to rein in the Conservation
Authorities (C.A.s).(Downloads - 86)
Quick View