When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion. As with a number of different agencies, such as Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) inspectors, Ministry of the Environment (MOE) inspectors, By-Law Inspectors, to name a few, the Conservation Authorities are not, lawfully, to expand beyond their legislative authority, and yet they frequently do.
Conservation Authorities Conservation Ontario: Redundant & Grasping for Power
When the Conservation Authorities were introduced, they were meant to be an advisory body that provided specific areas of Ontario, as creatures of the municipalities and the Ministry of Public Works, information and an ability to eliminate flooding and erosion.
(Downloads - 171)
Related products
-
The Municipal Councillor’s Guide: Making Ontario a Better Place to Grow
This document explains how no one is reading the legislation, in its entirety, to know the intent of the legislation.
(Downloads - 60)
Quick View -
Conservation Authorities: The Legislator’s Intent
Conservation Authorities, throughout Ontario are actively trying to expand their jurisdiction from what belongs to the Conservation Authorities, usurping private property rights.
(Downloads - 114)
Quick View -
Electrical Power Pricing
This short report will show that the provincial government, by means of the Hydro/Ontario Power Generation, policy advisors, the Ministry of Energy, has been following recommendations which could be considered criminal and may involve breach of trust.
(Downloads - 44)
Quick View -
The OSPCA Act: Hidden Denied Oversight
There are very few changes between the original Letters Patent of incorporation of the OSPCA from 1913 in comparison to today’s act.
(Downloads - 23)
Quick View