Ethical Developers by Tom Black
- 2017-08-01
- By admin
- Posted in Latest News
Over the last few months, the Carleton Landowners Association has been involved with bureaucrats from the city of Ottawa. Ottawa has introduced a plan to bring in a site-alteration bylaw. I was present at some of these meetings. It seems that the city has decided to identify the OLA group in the area as stakeholders, and asked us to participate in the design of the new bylaw. Now some would say that this is a good thing, so we should be happy to participate. Well not so fast! First of all by participating, we run the risk of the city using our participation as a form of endorsement of their bylaw, even if they don’t take any of our advice when they write it.
But let’s look deeper and not just jump to the beat of their drum. This bylaw is directed ONLY at private property owners. The only exemptions are for the city and its agents. Can you imagine? They state that the reason for the bylaw is to protect good farmland from developers. But there is no protection of farmland from developers. All the rules in the bylaw are aimed at the property owner, and even though they state that there is an exemption for normal farm practices, there is no protection if a neighbour makes a complaint. At that point, bylaw gets involved and anyone who has been the focus of a bylaw enforcement complaint knows well that these complaints don’t come to a common sense conclusion.
Now the biggest reason to reject this initiative is because the city does not have the right to make bylaws that apply to private property. Bylaws are made by a corporation to set the rules on how that corporation runs its business. One corporation cannot make bylaws to control some other corporation. In the law a corporation only has the rights equal to that of an individual person and no individual person can make rules or bylaws that would give them control over someone else’s property. These site-alteration bylaws are driven by EXTREME environmentalists who believe private owners cannot be trusted to protect their property from developers or from destroying natural features of the land. Whether intentional or by misguided emotions, these activists actually make it easier for developers to get their way. No city has a significant wetland in the middle of it because they are all filled up as the development plans start to take shape.
So how do we protect the most important land in the country which is good productive farmland? It is the rarest of all the significant natural features, and it has no real protection under the law. Now from a property rights point of view, that is the way it should be. Everyone should be able to use their property as they see fit and for their profit. However, from society’s point of view it doesn’t make sense to cover up our best food producing land that needs to be preserved to feed our kids in the future.
So how do we save farmland? Some have tried buying it up and putting it in land trusts but this will never save the majority of the good land. Governments of all stripes, farmers, local food enthusiast and concerned citizens in general have struggled for years to solve this problem. I too have long wondered what we, as people can do to break the ‘addiction’ that developers have for using farmland to build houses on. A possible solution came to me as I spent hours in the tractor working this spring. What if we did what we have done to ‘smokers’, to ‘drinking and driving’ or to ‘factory farms’ with laying hens locked in small cages? What if we make developers who build on good farmland worthy of the disgust of society. Could we educate the home-buyer to demand houses be built on land that has little value as far as food production goes? What if we gave developers a rating? All the fast food chains have moved to ensure that their customers that they only buy meat from ethical producers.
Why can’t we buy houses from Ethical Developers
Search:
Categories
Archives
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- October 2012
- May 2012
- September 2011