Environmental Land Tribunal Collingwood
- 2016-06-01
- By admin
- Posted in Latest News
It is hard to come up with a standard name for this hearing since there are seven appellants. Therefore we will use the following as reference:
16 036 Wiggins v. Ontario MOECC
The hearing also includes, 16 037 Elwood v. Ontario MOECC; 16 038 Simcoe County/ Clearview v. Ontario MOECC; 16 039 Corp of County Simcoe v. Ontario MOECC; 16 040 Preserve Clearview Inc. v. Ontario MOECC; 16 041 Corporation Town of Clearview v. Ontario MOECC; 16 042 Town of Collingwood v. Ontario MOECC; Participant, Canadian Owners and Pilot’s Association (COPA)
The Wiggins vs Ontario is one of the largest Environmental Review Tribunal hearings with many issues coming together. As with the previous 30 plus tribunals to date the Appellants are only able to appeal on “Serious harm to human health and serious and irreversible harm to animal plant life and the environment”.
Early in the hearing Elizabeth Marshall, Legal Researcher for the Ontario Landowners Association gave her presentation. Ms. Marshall also does research for lawyers, MPs and MPPs as well. In her 88 pages of documented questions Ms. Marshall had many concerns about the legislative regime set up for Wind Energy projects. She also questioned the serious harm that can be caused from ice throw or ice fling from wind turbine blade tips moving at 200 km or more. To put it into perspective imagine getting hit by a kilogram or more of ice moving at a speed 2 or 3 times the speed of a pitch in baseball. She stated that you may see signs on roads near turbines where the light is flashing to warn drivers of the possibility of ice fling or throw.
Ms. Marshall stated that there is a lack of definition as to what “serious harm to human health” is. At the end of the hearing usually the tribunal says that the appellants didn’t prove serious harm to human health so the wind project is approved. A comparison would be to high jumping if you didn’t know where the bar was going to be set and the judges said you didn’t jump high enough.
Secondly, in the first week the tribunal heard excellent testimony by presenters and experts giving evidence on the effects of the environment and endangered species or species at risk if the WPD Wind Turbine project proceeds, as approved in February 2016. It was also shown that full studies were not completed on wetlands on private property in the wind project area where there are species at risk including brown bats.
Thirdly, Kevin Elwood, and George Daniels presented and gave expert evidence respectively in the aviation field explaining their safety concerns relating to the Collingwood Registered Airport and the Clearview Aerodrome (Stayner). The Renewable Energy Approval permits 8 turbines 4 km from the runways at the Collingwood Airport and a 2 kilometer area around the Clearview Aerodrome. Also the helipad at the Collingwood Hospital for Medivac Services was included in their concerns.
Pierre Lajoie, Manager of the Collingwood airport, stated that there are over 12,000 takeoffs and landings at the airport each year during work hours so there is concern about serious harm to health for pilots, passengers, student pilots and hospital patients. As well the turbines will negatively affect future expansion of aviation, tourism and business development of the Collingwood area. Pilots are always concerned about quick weather changes off Georgian Bay and being able to land and takeoff safely. The ice fling and strong wind turbulence from turbines add to these safety concerns.
This hearing continues again from May 30th to June 3rd. There are still 13 or more people who have prepared to give evidence at the Collingwood Curling Club. There is a possibility that the hearing may have to be extended further into June. If you can arrange time, this is a public hearing and you can attend and learn more as to how the WPD wind project can affect the Collingwood area for years to come. The appellants would appreciate your support.
For further information Google: Canadian Owners and Pilots Association for the Petition and the following link for an interview with MPP Jim Wilson and Kevin Elwood.
Search:
Categories
Archives
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- October 2012
- May 2012
- September 2011